Women, Slaves & Homosexuals
On Sunday night a few of us who had recently read William Webb’s book Slaves, Women & Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of Cultural Analysis, gathered at my house to have dinner and discuss the book. In the near future, I am planning a series of posts on “Why I am an egalitarian,” but for now, let me just reference the book a little bit.
- I’d say that the subtitle to this book is more significant than the title. The central question Webb seeks to answer is “how does one determine whether something you read in the Bible is culturally bound or trans-cultural?” I think that for most of my life, I’ve does this intuitively, but that’s probably not good enough. Webb, gives a structure, with his 18 Criteria to think through a host of cultural issues.
- I was reminded that everyonetreats parts of the Bible as cultural. Sometimes, conservatives, like to play the “we just read the Bible and do what it says,” and yet they don’t greet each other with a holy kiss (Romans 16:16), disallow braided hair for women (1 Timothy 2:9), or lift their hands in worship (1 Timothy 2:8).
- I’d probably have to claim ignorance as to whether Webb’s criteria are the right criteria or the bestcriteria. I’m not engaged in the academic realm enough or smart enough to think that comprehensively. Although, I would say that his criteria seem to be solid.
- I think that Webb’s 18 criteria work well against “slippery slope” arguments. Whenever you start talking about what cultural and what’s trans-cultural, some people start arguing that if you say something is cultural, than you can slide down the slippery slope to saying that everything in the Bible is cultural and can therefore be ignored. Webb’s framework works against this particular logical fallacy.
- Ultimately Webb’s book, has helped me formulate my egalitarian views — I’ve been riding the fence on this one for a while…feeling stuck in my own mind and heart, pitting Galatians 3:28 vs. 1 Tmothy 2:11-15.
Overall — this is a good read — I’d say an essential read for anyone who teaches the Bible on a regular basis or who is interested in “digging in,” a little deeper.


regardless of where you fall on the issue, why would you pit galatians 3:28 against 1 timothy 2:11-15?
i’m not sure either of them really speak that well to the question of women as “elders”…
just wanted to stir it up a bit.
i hope none of your old c’ville profs read this!
david
February 27, 2007 at 12:59 pm
just in the sense that I think much of the debate is about starting places…some people start with the hierarchy in 1 Timothy, and others start with the equality of Galatians…
I’ll articulate it better next week
charliedean
February 27, 2007 at 2:15 pm
I am not familiure with the book at all and plan to flp through the pages the next time i am at borders.
its intersting to consider gender espesially given this… I like to think of God (the trinity) as a male, but really out side of Christ I do not know gender of the other 2 in the trinity. Yes there is God the Father, but typically the term father as it realates to when written in scriputer is a title to discribe attributes. Im not saying this is similar to the movie “dogma” just its interesting to think about. One of those deals if you think of what Jesus looks like you would think of some white guy with a beard, but let’s face it… he was a Jewish Arabic
Mizz
February 27, 2007 at 5:22 pm